Portfolio

The Lecturer ... (Response scale: "disagree" to "agree")

• conveys even complicated contents clearly and understandably.
• uses media and visualisation (slides, blackboard, presentation, ...) in a helpful way.
• offers the participants sufficient opportunities to participate in the discussion.
• appears competent.

Seminar: Behavior of the lecturer

The Lecturer ... (Response scale: "disagree" to "agree")

• clearly explains the content and objectives that participants' contributions should fulfill.
• supports participants adequately in preparing their contributions.
• gives constructive feedback on the participants' contributions.
• adds valuable input to the participants' contributions.
• encourages questions and active participation.
• reasonably divides the course time (into lectures, discussions, clarification of questions, ...).

Seminar: Participants' contributions

The participants' contributions ... (Response scale: "disagree" to "agree")

• are delivered appropriately (media use, handout, ...)
• are didactically well prepared (structuring, clarity, ...).
• are at an appropriate level in terms of content.
• contribute to the understanding of the subject matter.

Exercise/Tutorial: Behavior of the lecturer

The Lecturer ... (Response scale: "disagree" to "agree")

• supports participants appropriately in working on the assignments.
• evaluates the results and solutions in detail with the participants.
• approaches results in a way that allows learning from mistakes.
• encourages questions and active participation.
• coordinates this course well with the main lecture.
• answers questions competently and understandably.

Exercise/Tutorial: Assignments

The assignments, practical excercises, etc. ... (Response scale: "disagree" to "agree")

• are expressed in an understandable way.
• are appropriately difficult.
• build well on the knowledge of the main lecture.
• contribute to a deeper understanding of the course content.
• are discussed or corrected in a comprehensible manner.

Please assess your workload for this course. (Response scale: "too low" to "too high")

• The workload that is expected for this course is ...
• The amount of work that I put into this course is ...
• The amount of content covered in the course is ...
• I find the pace of the course seems ...
• The level of the course is ...
  
  

How many sessions of the course did you miss? (Response scale: 0,1,2,3,>4)

Please evaluate the general conditions of this course. (Response scale: "disagree" to "agree")

• The spatial conditions (size of the room, quality of the building, location, ...) are sufficient for this course.
• The time frame of the course (date, duration, overlaps, ...) is appropriate.
• The equipment (technology, WiFi availability, models, ...) is appropriate for this course.
• The provided supplementary materials (literature, script, ...) are helpful.
• Overall, I am satisfied with the general conditions of the course.

If specific aspects of your course are not covered by our questionnaires or Add-on Modules, you can address your own topics in the "Free Items" Add-on Module. For this purpose, the following item formats are available:

Rating Scale
In this Add-on Module, you can formulate up to 6 individual statements yourself. These statements must be assessable on a five-point scale. You can freely determine the poles of the response scale (e.g. ‘disagree’ to ‘agree’).

Open Answer
In this Add-on Module, you can ask 2 open questions, which are answered by the participants in a short comment.

The digital media and tools used ... (Response scale: "disagree" to "agree")

• make it easier for me to learn on my own.
• help to present complex relationships in an understandable way.
• help me to stay mentally alert.
• motivate me to work continuously during the semester.
• help me to test my own level of knowledge/learning progress.
• require a reasonable effort in relation to the personal benefit.

Please assess the interaction in the digital environment. (Response scale: "disagree" to "agree")

• Working in the digital space encourages me to voice questions, suggestions or problems in understanding.
• I received helpful feedback (from lecturers or fellow students).
• Digital group work (e.g. in breakout sessions) is designed to be meaningful and instructive.
• The ratio of synchronous teaching (everyone present at the same time) and asynchronous work (everyone working on their own) is well chosen.
• There were disruptions so that I could not work/learn efficiently (e.g. content not available, poor internet connection, problems with operation).

Please assess the work with the learning platform (e.g. Moodle). (Response scale: "to a small extent" to "to a large extent")

• The materials are clearly stored on the learning platform and are easy to find.
• Along with the course, the contents were constantly updated and expanded.
• By using the learning platform, I engaged more intensively with the course content.
• I actively use the learning platform (write posts, ask or answer questions).
• I exchange information with the lecturer and/or fellow students on the learning platform.
• The lecturer moderates and encourages interaction on the learning platform.

Please assess the general conditions of the videos/live broadcasts. (Response scale: "disagree" to "agree")

• I was satisfied with the picture quality.
• I was satisfied with the audio quality.
• The length of the videos/live screencasts was appropriate.
• The scope of the material in the individual videos/live screencasts was appropriate.
• The videos were reasonably subdivided/prepared (bookmarks, chapters).
• I could access the videos/live screencasts without any problems (e.g. download, open, participate in calls/live broadcasts).

Through the use of the digital media and tools in this course I have … (Response scale: "to a small extent" to "to a large extent")

• learned how to use digital media in a targeted way. 
• enhanced my technical skills in using digital media.
• enhanced my ability to communicate in virtual spaces. 
• developed my practical skills in media production (e.g. creating websites, a podcast).
• acquired practical skills in the use of digital media for professional life.

If only individual items from the Add-on Modules for digital teaching are of interest to you, you can put together your own selection of up to six items from the other modules for digital teaching in this Add-on Module.

Please assess the behavior of the participants. (Response scale: "low" to "high")

• The level of engagement from the participants was ...
• The prior knowledge of the participants was ...
• The interest and attention of the participants were ...
• Respect and appreciation among participants were ...

Please assess the practical exercises / tasks (e.g. group work, assignments, individual work phases). (Response scale: "too low" to "too high")

• The number of exercises/tasks performed was ...
• The difficulty level of the exercises/tasks was ...
• The allocated time for the exercises/tasks was ...
• The number of application examples was ...
• The support provided by the instructor for completing the exercises/tasks was ...

Please relate the course to your work context. (Response scale: "to a small extent" to "to a large extent")

• My participation in this course is viewed positively by my supervisor/mentor.
• The course complements the content of my work in a meaningful way.
• The acquired knowledge/skills are very helpful for my work at the university.
• The acquired knowledge/skills are very helpful for my professional development.

Please evaluate the general conditions of this course. (Response scale: "disagree" to "agree")

• The organization by the coordinating entity proceeded smoothly (registration, directions, payment, etc.).
• The spatial conditions (location, size, acoustics, technology, etc.) were good.
• The time frame (duration, time, date, etc.) was well chosen.
• The group size was appropriate.
• The provided supplementary materials (handouts, documents, literature references, etc.) were helpful.
• The time management within the course (breaks, adherence to the schedule, etc.) was good.

Please assess the digital elements of the course. (Response scale: "to a small extent" to "to a large extent")

• The interaction in the digital space was well moderated and promoted exchange among participants.
• In the digital space, it was easy for me to ask questions, provide suggestions, or express difficulties in understanding.
• Digital group work (e.g. breakout sessions) was meaningful and educational.
• The digital tools used enhanced learning in the course.
• The digital tools/methods used helped me to stay mentally alert.
• There were disruptions, which prevented me from working/learning efficiently (e.g. unavailable content, poor internet connection, operational issues).

If specific aspects of your course are not covered by our questionnaires or add-on modules, you can address your own topics in the "Free Items" add-on module. For this purpose, the following item formats are available:

Rating scale
In this advanced module, you can formulate up to 6 individual statements yourself. These statements must be assessable on a five-point scale. You can freely determine the poles of the response scale (e.g. ‘disagree’ to ‘agree’).

Free text
In this advanced module, you can ask 2 open questions, which are answered by the participants in a short comment.

(Response scale: "disagree" to "agree")

• My participation in this course is viewed positively by my supervisor/mentor.
• The course complements the content of my work in a meaningful way.
• The acquired knowledge/skills are very helpful for my work at the hospital.
• The acquired knowledge/skills are very helpful for my professional development.

(Response scale: "no "/ "yes")

• I was given time off for the synchronous workshop time.
• I was given time off for the asynchronous self-study period.

(Response scale: "disagree" to "agree")

• The self-study helped me prepare for the synchronous teaching phase.
• The moodle room is intuitive to use.
• I wish for more asynchronous self-study time.

(Response scale: "< 3" bis "> 15")

• Approximately how many hours did you spend on self-study for this course?

(Response scale: "disagree" to "agree")

• The workshop's objectives were communicated clearly.
• The participants' expectations were discussed.
• The workshop instructor was open towards the participants.
• The workshop facilitated exchange and collaboration among the participants.
• The mix of input/lecture and practical components was well-balanced.
• The workshop instructor informed the participants about confidentiality and handling of personal data.